Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Monday, March 26, 2012

Trayvon Martin and the end of excuses

By Charles P. Pierce
Esquire Magazine

24 March 12 - We have become a nation in which children have become expendable. Trayvon Martin is just the most recent example.

We executed children in this country until long after the rest of the world - except Iran - thought that was a good idea. Almost six million children live in poverty in this country. Almost six million of them are without health insurance of any kind, and that's reckoned to be an improvement. None of this is accidental. These children are expendable because the people we elect make policy decisions of which we approve - or, at least, of which we do not disapprove. The Republicans in Congress - behind the "leadership" of zombie-eyed granny-starver Paul Ryan - would like to zero out the SCHIP children's health-care program. If they do that, it will not be done by accident. The Florida legislature, behind the leadership of the National Rifle Association, passed the "stand your ground" law, despite the fact that even police and prosecutors were warning that it amounted to a hunting license for anyone who had both a gun, and the ability to concoct a good story. Trayvon Martin is not dead by accident.

But, already, even in the face of widespread outrage, the notion is continuing to circulate through the country, like topical anesthetic working on an open wound, that what happened to Trayvon Martin was, if not entirely accidental, then merely a combination of unfortunate circumstances culminating in an entirely regrettable event. (That's not even to mention the wilder precincts of mouth-breathing public commentary. If you ever needed proof that whatever consulting genius came up with the idea of having a Comments section follow every newspaper story deserves to die a slow and painful death by honey and fire ants, this story is pretty much what you're looking for.) Conservatives caution the president not to "inject race" into the incident any further, because, as we know, we can't tell how much of a factor "race" was, because George Zimmerman was half-Hispanic and because of the backward masking on the Sergeant Pepper album. (I am not kidding.) Geraldo Rivera, looking for relevance in all the wrong places, blames hoodies:

But I am urging the parents of black and Latino youngsters particularly to not let their children go out wearing hoodies. I think the hoodie is as much responsible for Trayvon Martin's death as George Zimmerman was.... Every time you see someone sticking up a 7-11, the kid is wearing a hoodie.... When you see a black or Latino youngster, particularly on the street, you walk to the other side of the street. You try to avoid that confrontation.

(And every time I see someone convicted of ripping off pension funds, he's wearing a $500 suit. Don't wear $500 suits!)

For his part, the president was calm and measured, because that's the way the president is, and because he is rather circumscribed in what he can say publicly on topics like this because of factors that should be obvious from the Comments section above. Nevertheless, he neatly put Florida's deeply unpopular Republican governor, Rick Scott, on the spot:

"I am glad that not only is the Justice Department looking into this, but the governor of the state of Florida has put together a task force."

Translation: Make it a good one, Rick, because your ass is in this jackpot, too.

Well I certainly don't feel calm and measured, and it's not because my kids "could have been Trayvon." No, they could not have. My kids are white. They lived in the suburbs. They could wear their pants anyway they liked. They could have worn hoodies to Midnight Mass on Christmas Eve, and nobody would have looked askance at them, let alone blown them away with a handgun. (As I recall, I once wore a black hoodie to Midnight Mass on Christmas Eve.) The worst threat to my children's lives in the big wide world was that some suburban matron who couldn't see over the steering wheel would run them down in the family SUV. They didn't have to worry about running into some trigger-happy, half-mad wannabe on the way home from the convenience store. And that's what keeps me from being calm and measured.

I am sick to death of people who celebrate "the family" making excuses about why other people's children are expendable. I am sick to death of politicians who are more concerned about protecting zygotes than about the teenagers on whom they seek to balance their budgets and advance their careers. (Barney Frank's line about conservatives's believing that life "begins at conception and ends at birth" was not entirely a joke, although it's always been treated as one.) I am sick to death of opportunistic yahoos who can look at this country's unhealthy attachment to firearms and declare that the actions of George Zimmerman, while unfortunate, were pretty much what the Founders had in mind. I am sick to death of the steady drip-drip-drip of all the topical anesthetics we mix up whenever something like this happens. Had Emmett Till been killed in 2012, there'd be at least three people sitting in the CNN Green Room right now - and probably 15 of them sitting offstage at Fox - waiting to explain how unfortunate it was that the lad so transgressed against local custom that circumstances dictated that he be beaten to a pulp and tossed into the river tied to a cotton-gin fan. I am sick to death about how we can argue about anything simply to argue about it, and then move along to the next argument, as though anything at all has been settled.

I think this controversy has some legs to it. What alarms me is not that Zimmerman hasn't yet been arrested, but the awful feeling that the Florida legislature, with the approval of the people of Florida, may have passed a law so idiotic that it prevents local law-enforcement from arresting him at all. (I can't imagine what the good cops in Sanford must be feeling today. The dispatcher told this clown not to pursue Martin, and he did it anyway. They must simply be angry at the world at this point.) And what makes me angry down to my soul is not that my children could have been Trayvon, but that, because of the way we have ordered our politics and our society, only someone like Trayvon could have been Trayvon.

(EDITOR'S NOTE: IN RESPONSE TO A READER'S COMMENT THAT THIS ARTICLE RECEIVED NO COMMENTS, BELOW ARE JUST A FEW - INCLUDING ONE FROM FORMER PAYSON MAYOR BOB EDWARDS:)

Charles P. Pierce of Esquire Magazine should be a bit cautious before making a declarative definition of true justice in the Trayvon Martin tragedy; but, from the tone of his article I suspect caution is not in his DNA.

While we have all heard a lot of views on this issue, facts are being closely held by the investigators as they should; yet, the New Black Panthers have put a price on the head of the shooter and Al Sharpton and others who live off the continuation of racial divide are doing what they can to make this into a simple lynching.

When a person, who presents himself as a true journalist, plays into this same hysteria we should be concerned. America needs a quieter more mature and measured approach to volatile issues. The President, presidential candidates, self-proclaimed moral conscious sages and others should let the issue be sorted out by the justice system and then if that determination indicates needed changes in our society then start the discussion. 
 
Bob Edwards
Payson

# Dick Huopana 2012-03-25 05:05
Unfortunately, it seems destined that "this tragedy will be shamelessly repeated." Why? Because our gun-saturated America has become the "land of the free...to kill."

+30 # Obwon 2012-03-25 05:14
Well, as far as "neighborhood watch" goes, the 911 dispatcher took that away when told Zimmerman not to follow. After all, those are the rules right? Neighborhood watchers agree not to be vigilantees and the way that they do this is by avering that they will obey the rules.

Zimmerman violated the rules, everything that springs from that violation is his own responsibility. If he was in trouble, he was responsible for that trouble! Since he had violated Treyvon's rights, not the other way around. He had absolutely no right to approach, talk to or otherwise get involved with Martin. So, as a criminal who has invaded someones right to privacy, he can't claim self defense. Anymore than a thief can come into your home, shoot you, and then claim self defense because you tried to shoot him.

Zimmerman was ordered to stand down and he disobeyed that order, that made him into a vigilante unlawful! Against whom Martin had every right to defend himself!

+16 # Capn Canard 2012-03-25 08:21
Obwon, agreed... Zimmerman was judge jury and executioner when there was no crime. Treyvon did nothing and yet died WWB. I am gobsmacked when there are those who try to defend actions of a killer like George Zimmerman. I presume that fearful people, like George Zimmerman, will step into a steaming pile of stupidity when they allow their fear to overpower their good sense.

+15 # NanFan 2012-03-25 09:51
That is the best argument for arresting and prosecuting Zimmerman I've ever heard: he ignored the order from the police to do nothing, and he committed murder.

If he was bruised and cut by Trayvon...and I stress the "if" since we don't know for sure (no arrest or pictures taken of him)...then, it was Trayvon who was acting in self-defense. This guy had a gun! Would you not try to run or fight back when someone had a gun in your face?

But in reality, we don't KNOW anything but the fact that Zimmerman admitted shooting Trayvon, who according to authorities, had nothing but skittles and an iced tea in his hands, and a hoodie on his head.

This Florida law reeks of America's greatest woe: we've been taught that it's okay to kill and believe that that is the ONLY way to protect ourselves.

Thanks, Obwon, for your insights into this situation.

N.

+34 # Kasandra 2012-03-24 13:10
It's obvious that this problem came up not so much because of certain individuals, but because of the System. This is really the core problem. Football and all those "spectator sports" are really quite barbaric throwbacks of the Roman Days, when competition, killing, torture and maiming were supposed to be something we cheer about! Excuse me? When is humanity going to grow up and BE WELL!? Guess we'll have to consume this planet like we did the other empty ones in the sky that are mirroring our gross dysfunction as a species!

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I can understand why this opinion article has 0 comments. Obvviously this article has been prepared by the most liberal-minded, narrow-minded person who could ever put pen to paper. Tryig to lead readers to believe that the President must be very careful regarding what he says because he is black, is racial in itself. I will end by saying, this opinion article does not deserve even this comment.

Noble said...

If, in fact, the so-called neighborhood watch guy, Zimmeman, is found to be guilty of cold blooded murder, then of course, he should have the legal book thrown at him. If he hunted down young Trayvon Martin, confronted him and shot him without provocation, no mercy should be shown.
What troubles me as much as anything, though, is the snap rush to a guilty judgement of thousands of people, all over the country.
Vigilante "justice" has more often than not resulted in innocent people being murdered or wrongly imprisoned.More and more, we are learning of innocent individuals being released from prison after dozens of years of incarceration because of new evidence. Ambitious prosecutors wanting to make a name for themselves have sometimes been found to have taken illegal short cuts in oder to please an emotional public.
There is an excellent reason why we are admonished to consider a person innocent until proven guilty.
Not one of us was present when this terrible incident took place. There are conflicting reports from "witnesses." Mr. Zimmerman definitely received injuries consistant with an attack. Imagining him simply walking up to an unknown person and gunning him down for no reason other than harboring a hatred for young black men in hoodies, is a bit of a stretch, really. Was he wrong in apparently following him? It appears so, but that doen't automatically mean he shot the young man down in cold blood. He apparently had no prior history of bigotry.
All the angry demonstrations and speech making only encourage some among us to take the law into their hands. This is wrong, and should not be tolerated anymore than one commiting a crime. if Vigilante Law becomes the law of the land, none of us is safe.

Everyone should take a deep breath and let the investigators do their work, free from uncontrolled emotional pressure.

Remember the "Olympic Bomber" in Atlanta during the 1996 Olympic Games? Everyone claimed he was guilty including the FBI. Well, he was completely innocent, but the accusations ruined his life.

God save us from vigilantes.

people getting Very little is actually known of the true circumstances of this incident.

James Keyworth said...

Actually there are lots and lots of comments on this article. Just go to the end of the article at readersupportednews.org to read them.

Editor

James Keyworth said...

P.S. I have added some of the comments to the original post.

Editor